Europeans angry after Bush climate speech 'charade'

President Bush was castigated by European diplomats and found himself isolated on Sept. 28 after a special conference on climate change ended without any progress. European ministers, diplomats and officials attending the Washington conference were scathing, particularly in private, over Bush's failure once again to commit to binding action on climate change. Although the US and Britain have been at odds over the environment since the early days of the Bush administration, the gap has never been as wide as now. Britain and almost all other European countries, including Germany and France, want mandatory targets for reducing greenhouse emissions. Bush, while talking about a "new approach" and "a historic undertaking," remains totally opposed. The conference, attended by more than 20 countries, including China, India, Britain, France and Germany, broke up with the US isolated, according to non-Americans attending. One of those present said even China and India, two of the biggest polluters, accepted that the voluntary approach proposed by the US was untenable and favored binding measures, even though they disagreed with the Europeans over how this would be achieved. A senior European diplomat attending the conference, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the meeting confirmed European suspicions that it had been intended by Bush as a spoiler for a major UN conference on climate change in Bali in December. "It was a total charade and has been exposed as a charade," the diplomat said. "I have never heard a more humiliating speech by a major leader. He [Bush] was trying to present himself as a leader while showing no sign of leadership. It was a total failure." John Ashton, Britain's special envoy on climate change, who attended the conference, said: "It is striking here how isolated the US has become on this issue. There is no support among the industrialized countries for the proposition that we should proceed on the basis of voluntary commitments. Other European governments expressed similar sentiments. Although many of those attending had predicted the conference would break up without significant agreement, there had been hopes that Bush, in search of a legacy, might produce a surprise. Instead, he stuck to his previous position, shunning mandatory caps in favor of coal, nuclear power and developing biofuels. Elizabeth Bast, of Friends of the Earth, described the conference as a diversion. "We have heard it before. He put a huge emphasis on technology and does not speak to binding targets, and there is a great emphasis on coal and nuclear energy," she said.