Religious conferences equal to terrorism

In a case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the New York Civil Liberties Union, a federal judge in Buffalo, NY, has ruled that the federal government can treat innocent US citizens as terrorists when returning to the United States from religious conferences, say the organizations. "As this decision demonstrates, we now are reaching a point in this country where the 'war on terrorism' has turned into a war on the constitution," said New York Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Donna Lieberman. "With the recent disclosures about government spying on political activity, we no longer can trust our government to respect our most cherished traditions, including our right to religious freedom." Judge William Skretny dismissed the lawsuit brought on behalf of US citizens who were detained for up to six hours, interrogated, fingerprinted and photographed by border authorities when they returned from a large, mainstream Islamic conference that took place last December in Toronto, Canada. Under the ruling, the government is free to repeat its actions for this year's conference. "It is hard to believe that a court would dismiss what the government did to innocent Americans as simply 'unfortunate and understandably frustrating.' It is also fundamentally unconstitutional and we are confident that the appeals court will ultimately vindicate their fundamental rights," continued Lieberman. Noting that "There is no information whatsoever to suggest, and the government does not contend, that plaintiffs are anything other than law-abiding American citizens," the court nonetheless held that the government was free to treat all of the plaintiffs as potential terrorists because the government had intelligence suggesting that people involved in terrorism might be attending an Islamic conference like the one in Toronto. On the basis of this information, the Department of Homeland Security directed border agents across the country to process as potential terrorists every single person they could identify as returning from the Islamic conference last December. The conference, which featured high-level Canadian political leaders and law-enforcement officials as speakers, was attended by over 10,000 people. "When law-abiding American citizens cannot attend religious conferences without being treated as terrorists by our government, our constitution and the most important values of our society are in peril," said New York Civil Liberties Union Associate Legal Director Christopher Dunn, who is lead counsel on the case. "We will appeal this decision and vigorously pursue our claim that concerns about terrorism do not eradicate the constitutional rights of American citizens." Despite the ruling, several plaintiffs plan to attend this year's conference. "I believe in religious freedom, and I will not allow the federal government to intimidate me out of that belief," said plaintiff Hassan Shibley.