Saddam Hussein's trial is in shambles

The trial of Saddam Hussein collapsed into chaos within minutes of restarting when the former Iraqi leader and his legal team stormed out in protest at the forced removal of a co-defendant from the courtroom. The case had resumed on Jan. 29 with a new chief judge, the third to hold the post in the past fortnight, immediately clashing with the accused and their lawyers. The proceedings came to a premature halt after Saddam's former intelligence chief and half-brother, Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti, was dragged out for asserting that the court was nothing but "the daughter of the whore." Saddam stood up in solidarity, shouting "down with traitors" and–down with America." The new chief judge, Raouf Abdel-Rahman, then expelled one of the defense lawyers, Salih al-Armouti–a Jordanian who had recently joined the team–accusing him of inciting his clients. "Can you do this in your own courts in your own country?" the judge asked. "Why don't we start criminal proceedings against you?" Saddam, his co-accused, and their entire legal team then walked out in protest, insisting they would boycott future sessions unless the presiding judge apologized. Judge Abdel-Rahman–who had been expected to impose a tougher grip on the proceedings–then ruled that the lawyers will not be allowed back. He appointed four new defense lawyers and the case resumed with just four of the eight defendants and none of the original lawyers present. The scenes of pandemonium at the special tribunal in Baghdad led to further declarations by the original defense team that the proceedings had lost all credibility and should be moved to another country. During the curtailed hearing, Judge Abdel-Rahman repeatedly clashed with Saddam. At one point, when the former ruler of Iraq said he wanted to leave the court, the judge shouted: "You do not leave. I allow you to leave when I want to." Saddam responded: "I was the president of your country for 35 years." The judge said: "I am the judge and you are the defendant" as two guards tried to push Saddam back into his chair. At that point, the judge changed his mind, and asked them to let the former ruler out of the court. Saddam then said: "It is a tragedy. I led you for 35 years. How can you lead me out of court?" Saddam and his co-defendants are charged with the deaths of 140 people in the Shia town of Dujail in 1982. He and the others face a series of other cases of alleged murder and human rights abuse. The Dujail trial has been mired in violence; seven people associated with it, including two defense lawyers, have been assassinated. A third lawyer has sought asylum abroad. After proceedings resumed on Jan. 29, a witness told the court how she was arrested a few days after an assassination attempt on Saddam at Dujail. She claimed her interrogators tore off her Islamic headscarf and applied electric shocks to her head. The woman, whose identity was not disclosed, told the court that 16 other members of her family were also arrested, and seven of them, including her husband, were killed in detention. Describing her alleged mistreatment, the woman said: "I was in pain. I thought my eyes would pop out." Two of the defendants who had remained in court–Ali Dayih Ali and Mizhar Abdullah Ruwayyid–were among those who had burst into her home to arrest her, she said. The four new court-appointed defense lawyers did not cross-examine her. The position of chief judge on the panel of five was originally held by Judge Rizgar Amin, who resigned on Jan. 15 blaming Iraqi and US officials for putting political pressure on him for giving Saddam too much of the platform in the televised trial. His successor, Sayeed al-Hamashi, a Shia, was removed a few days later after it was revealed that he was being investigated by the country's de-Baathification committee for his alleged close links to the former regime, even though US officials claimed the de-Baathification laws introduced in 2003 did not apply to the tribunal. Judge Abdel-Rahman is from Halabja, where 5,000 people died in a gas attack by Iraqi forces under Saddam in 1988. Tribunal officials insisted that, despite this, the judge would be "fair and impartial" in presiding over the trial.