White House accused of interfering in Abramoff probe

Democrats accused the White House on Jan. 27 of tampering with the investigation into the disgraced Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff after the prosecutor in charge of the inquiry was offered a federal judgeship by President Bush. In an appointment that the White House described as routine, Noel Hillman, in charge of unraveling the burgeoning bribery scandal on Capitol Hill that could ensnare dozens of Republican congressmen and their staff, will step down next week after accepting the offer of a judgeship in New Jersey. A group of Democrats demanded that a special prosecutor take over the investigation. The furor comes a month after Abramoff, once one of the most powerful lobbyists in Washington, pleaded guilty to bribing politicians. He is expected to cooperate with prosecutors and implicate up to half a dozen congressmen, in a case managed for two years by Hillman, who has intimate knowledge of its details. The latest twist in the Abramoff case, a politically explosive issue ahead of November's mid-term congressional elections, comes as Bush faces mounting pressure to release at least six photographs of him meeting Abramoff at White House parties and receptions. Referring to Hillman's judgeship offer, Congressman George Miller (D-CA) said, "It looks like the White House has reached in and tampered with an ongoing investigation." Calling the timing of the offer startling, he said, "You have one of the chief prosecutors removed from a case that has tentacles throughout the Republican leadership of Congress, throughout the various agencies and into the White House." Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Ken Salazar (D-CO) wrote to Alberto Gonzales, the Attorney-General, calling for a special prosecutor to take over to "ensure that the investigation and prosecution will proceed without fear or favor." The White House said that Bush was poised to nominate Hillman last summer, but did not say why it was delayed until last week. Scott McClellan, Bush's spokesperson, said the calls for a special prosecutor were "pure politics," adding that prosecutors at the Justice Department "are continuing to fully investigate" the Abramoff case. Bush continues to be dogged about the photographs. McClellan conceded that Abramoff, who lavished millions of dollars in campaign contributions on dozens of congressmen from both parties, had attended "staff-level" meetings in the Bush White House. But he said that Bush "does not recall meeting Abramoff." Democrats argue that the photographs were taken at taxpayers' expense and that in 1997 Bill Clinton was forced to release videotapes of him meeting big donors at White House functions. This month Bush's re-election campaign dumped $6,000 it had received from Abramoff, his wife and clients, giving the money to charity. Many other politicians have also given Abramoff-linked donations away. Asked on Jan. 25 why he would not release the photographs, Bush said: "I've had my picture taken with a lot of people. Having my picture taken with someone doesn't mean that I'm a friend with them or know them well. I'm also mindful that we live in a world in which those pictures will be used for pure political purposes, and they're not relevant to the investigation." Although there is no suggestion that Bush had any improper dealings with Abramoff, a report this month stated that Abramoff displayed on his office desk at least five pictures of himself and Bush. He told people that when they met, the president talked about his childrens' names and discussed personal details about their schooling.